Terraform: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "== Terraform vs Ansible == : In terms of popularity for individual configuration management tools, Ansible is now ahead of the pack, with a survey from TechRepublic showing that Ansible had the most widespread usage across survey respondents, at 41%, followed by Chef and Puppet in a tie at 31%, with Terraform at 31%, and Saltstack at 18%. <ref>https://www.upguard.com/blog/ansible-vs-chef#:~:text=In%20terms%20of%20popularity%20for,%2C%20and%20Saltstack%20at%2018%25.</re...") |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Terraform by HashiCorp == | |||
<blockquote> | |||
Terraform is an Infrastructure as Code (IaC) tool created by HashiCorp. It allows users to define, provision, and manage infrastructure in a declarative way using configuration files. These configuration files are human-readable and can be versioned, reused, and shared. Terraform supports various cloud providers and on-premises infrastructure, and it can manage resources like virtual machines, storage, and networking. | |||
Here's a more detailed explanation: | |||
Declarative Configuration: | |||
Terraform uses a declarative configuration language called HashiCorp Configuration Language (HCL). Instead of defining step-by-step instructions, users specify the desired state of the infrastructure, and Terraform figures out how to achieve that state. | |||
Infrastructure as Code: | |||
Terraform allows users to treat infrastructure as code, meaning they can manage their infrastructure using version control and code deployment practices. | |||
Multi-Cloud and On-Premises: | |||
Terraform supports a wide range of cloud providers and on-premises infrastructure, making it a versatile tool for managing various environments. | |||
Resource Management: | |||
Terraform can manage low-level components like compute instances, storage, and networking, as well as high-level components like DNS entries and SaaS features. | |||
Execution Plans: | |||
Terraform generates an execution plan before applying changes, allowing users to review the proposed changes and ensure they are as intended. | |||
Modules: | |||
Terraform supports modules, which are reusable units of configuration that can be used to package and share common infrastructure patterns. | |||
Workflow: | |||
Terraform follows a consistent workflow for provisioning and managing infrastructure throughout its lifecycle. | |||
Version Control: | |||
Terraform configuration files can be version controlled, allowing teams to track changes, collaborate, and revert to previous versions if needed. | |||
State Management: | |||
Terraform uses a state file to track the current state of the infrastructure it manages, allowing it to determine the necessary changes to achieve the desired state. <ref>https://www.google.com/search?q=terraform&rlz=1C1GCEA_en&oq=terraform&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyEQgAEEUYORhDGLEDGIAEGIoFMgwIARAjGCcYgAQYigUyDAgCEAAYQxiABBiKBTIMCAMQABhDGIAEGIoFMgwIBBAAGEMYgAQYigUyBggFEEUYPDIGCAYQRRg8MgYIBxBFGDzSAQgxODIyajBqN6gCALACAA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#vhid=zephyr:0&vssid=atritem-</ref> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
== Terraform vs Ansible == | == Terraform vs Ansible == | ||
Latest revision as of 19:53, 21 April 2025
Terraform by HashiCorp
Terraform is an Infrastructure as Code (IaC) tool created by HashiCorp. It allows users to define, provision, and manage infrastructure in a declarative way using configuration files. These configuration files are human-readable and can be versioned, reused, and shared. Terraform supports various cloud providers and on-premises infrastructure, and it can manage resources like virtual machines, storage, and networking.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Declarative Configuration: Terraform uses a declarative configuration language called HashiCorp Configuration Language (HCL). Instead of defining step-by-step instructions, users specify the desired state of the infrastructure, and Terraform figures out how to achieve that state.
Infrastructure as Code: Terraform allows users to treat infrastructure as code, meaning they can manage their infrastructure using version control and code deployment practices. Multi-Cloud and On-Premises: Terraform supports a wide range of cloud providers and on-premises infrastructure, making it a versatile tool for managing various environments.
Resource Management: Terraform can manage low-level components like compute instances, storage, and networking, as well as high-level components like DNS entries and SaaS features.
Execution Plans: Terraform generates an execution plan before applying changes, allowing users to review the proposed changes and ensure they are as intended.
Modules: Terraform supports modules, which are reusable units of configuration that can be used to package and share common infrastructure patterns.
Workflow: Terraform follows a consistent workflow for provisioning and managing infrastructure throughout its lifecycle.
Version Control: Terraform configuration files can be version controlled, allowing teams to track changes, collaborate, and revert to previous versions if needed.
State Management: Terraform uses a state file to track the current state of the infrastructure it manages, allowing it to determine the necessary changes to achieve the desired state. [1]
Terraform vs Ansible
- In terms of popularity for individual configuration management tools, Ansible is now ahead of the pack, with a survey from TechRepublic showing that Ansible had the most widespread usage across survey respondents, at 41%, followed by Chef and Puppet in a tie at 31%, with Terraform at 31%, and Saltstack at 18%. [2]
keywords
- ↑ https://www.google.com/search?q=terraform&rlz=1C1GCEA_en&oq=terraform&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyEQgAEEUYORhDGLEDGIAEGIoFMgwIARAjGCcYgAQYigUyDAgCEAAYQxiABBiKBTIMCAMQABhDGIAEGIoFMgwIBBAAGEMYgAQYigUyBggFEEUYPDIGCAYQRRg8MgYIBxBFGDzSAQgxODIyajBqN6gCALACAA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#vhid=zephyr:0&vssid=atritem-
- ↑ https://www.upguard.com/blog/ansible-vs-chef#:~:text=In%20terms%20of%20popularity%20for,%2C%20and%20Saltstack%20at%2018%25.