OpenWest 2014/Python to Go: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 15:11, 17 May 2014
by Brian G. Merrell
--
Compile first:
go help
test.go:
package main import "fmt" func main() { fmt.Println("test") }
go build -o test test.go
To just run the script:
go run test.go
--
Justifications:
- C++ too complex
- compilation too slow
- programming to difficult
- programmers choosing easy over safety and efficiency
--
Python bad because:
- actually quite complex
- runtime errors
- performance
- doesn't scale
--
Go has:
- concurrency is a breeze
- no exceptions
- no type hierarchies
- no classes
Go good because:
- small language (fit all in your head, have read the spec)
- compile time checks (fast)
- fast enough for even more things
- benefits at little cost
- dynamic feel with compiled performance
- rich standard library
- libraries are all written in Go
- great bundled tooling
- seems to scale well
- cross compiling in Go is simple
- Go syntax is very light and simple
--
Hello World Web server:
package main import ( "fmt" "net/http" ) func main() { http.HandleFunc("/", Hello") http.ListenAndServer("kicakhost:800", nil) } func Hello(w http.ResponseWrite, r *http.Request.... ???
--
Don't like about Go:
- Naked return statements (optional)
x,yz, =1,2,3 return
- scoping rules specific case
- not faster than java
- new vs &T{} vs make
- len("foo") vs "foo".Len() - but keeps lanuage simple
- Name "Go" is ungoogable / hastagable (use golang) *** MOST ANNOYING ***
- No dynamic linking in Go - makes binaries huge
- two compilers - may work with gccgo, just not with google's gc compiler
- no dlopen in Go
Python vs Go
- Interpreted vs Compiled
- Strongly typed vs Strongly typed
- Dynamically typed vs statically typed
- Garabage collected
- Unique syntax vs Similar to C
- Open Source
- Python Foundation vs Google
- more platforms vs fewer platforms
- 1991 vs
- ???
Go does not have:
- Classes
- Exceptions
- Assertions
- Templates / generics (for now)
- Operator overloading
Zen of Python
>>> import this
Go does not have:
- decorators
- static methods
- class methods
- properties
- iterators
- generators
- exceptions
- meta classes
- class decorators
- multiple inheritance
- list comprehensions
- ternary operator (expression?true:false)
--
Errors should never pass silently - sure beats runtime error
package main import ( "fmt" "net/url" ) func main() { u := url.Parse("http://foo.org/index%.html") // notice bad '%' /* fix u, err := url.Parse("http://foo.org") if err != nil { fmt.Println("got error") } */ fmt.Println(u.Host) }
Zero Values
Encapsulation - capitalized names are exported
Slices vs Lists
Arrays
Slicing syntax is very similar to python
Maps, Dicts and Sets
Duck typing - Go uses interfaces to solve
Exception handling - uses interfaces and type assertions to check
Calling C code from Go
go get - similar to pip
Unit testing and Code coverage
go test ./... go test -cover ./...
Other tools (included)
http://play.golang.org